Reform is Needed Now

Lutheran Development Service Distributes Cooking Oil in Swaziland. Photo: Stephen Padre/Bread for the World

Bread for the World is seeking reforms to food aid in its 2014 Offering of Letters because:

Americans support effective development.

    Almost 90 percent of Americans believe that improving health for people in developing countries should be one of the top priorities of U.S. foreign assistance, according to a 2012 poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation. Nearly two-thirds of those individuals specifically prioritize reducing hunger and malnutrition.
    Americans feel strongly that we have a moral and financial responsibility to help end hunger and poverty.

Flexibility saves dollars and lives.

    The practice of obtaining food close to the source of need, called local and regional purchases (LRP), allows for better-quality food aid that reaches those in need more quickly. Reaching women and children in the 1,000-day window with timely food aid is crucial. It’s also less expensive—on average, 30 percent cheaper than food aid that is shipped from the United States and other countries, which is the current practice. LRP would promote long-term food security because it supports local farmers’ efforts to improve their lives.
    A 2008 pilot to implement and study LRP activities in both emergency and non-emergency settings showed savings in both money and time. Using cash and vouchers where appropriate can also increase efficiency in delivering food aid. Having more options like these will enable specialized food-aid products and vitamins and minerals to be adjusted and targeted to the most vulnerable people, giving them better nutrition.

Nutritional quality of food aid is essential.

    The types of food aid distributed by the United States and other donors address hunger by providing needed calories but can fall short in addressing nutritional needs. Ensuring good nutrition to vulnerable groups has not been a high priority partly because emergency programs focus on immediate food shortages.
    Good nutrition early in life lays a foundation for health and productivity later in life and decreases people’s risk of hunger.

Adequate funding for food assistance and nutrition is crucial.

    Despite the continued importance of Food for Peace for alleviating hunger, particularly among women and children, funding has been cut significantly over the past several years. The cuts have come about in two main ways. First, pressure to cut overall government spending has led to reductions in funding for food aid. Second, Congress has essentially phased out supplemental appropriations, which in the past included vital resources for emergency food aid following disasters and other crises. Therefore, advocacy for sustaining a robust level of food-aid funding is essential.
    Economic analysts predict that food prices will continue to be high and volatile. Meanwhile, natural disasters, war zones, and severe drought increase the likelihood of failed harvests and food shortages. To meet this challenge, the United States and other donor countries will need to increase their food aid. Now is a time when advocates can point to new research and knowledge in agriculture and food programs and the importance of funding them.
Bread for the World
Twitter Flickr Facebook Youtube RSS