- About Hunger
- How to End Hunger
- Our Impact
- Get Involved
Washington, D.C. – Bread for the World commends its grassroots membership for efforts to protect SNAP (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly food stamps) and to improve international food aid in the Agricultural Act of 2014. Although it excludes some of the more drastic SNAP-cut and policy-change proposals, the bill includes a harmful cut to SNAP just months after the monthly allowances of SNAP beneficiaries were cut.
“This bill is a mixed bag,” said Rev. David Beckmann, president of Bread for the World. “While there are some positive aspects, such as food-aid reform provisions, we are disappointed with the $8.6 billion cut to SNAP. Any cut to SNAP is harmful to America’s struggling families, especially at this time when hunger in the U.S.A. is at an all-time high.”
The compromise bill, made public last night, is expected to be voted on by the House Wednesday, Jan. 29.
Bread members have been critical in advocating for much-needed food-aid reforms, as well as preventing deeper cuts to SNAP and other harmful policy changes affecting America’s struggling families. The compromise bill includes strong efforts to ensure that international food-assistance programs are more efficient and reach as many children and families as possible. This includes $80 million authorized for local and regional food procurement, increased cash flexibility for development programs, and efforts to improve the nutritional quality of U.S. food assistance.
Though less than the $40 billion cuts to SNAP proposed in 2013, the $8.6 billion cut included in the bill will have drastic implications for hundreds of thousands of SNAP households. While the bill will not kick current beneficiaries off the program, it will cut benefits for approximately 850,000 households.
“Congress must not forget that many American families are still struggling to put food on the table—especially at a time when unemployment remains high and programs that support hungry and poor people are at risk of greater cuts,” Beckmann added. “Any cut to SNAP is harmful.”
Excluded in the compromise bill are harsh work requirements that would have kicked parents with young children off SNAP, as well as drug-testing requirements. It also excludes the lifetime SNAP benefit ban on ex-offenders, which would have had severe consequences on those most marginalized. Bread for the World strongly opposed these policy changes. Finally, the bill does not cut the Food for Peace Program—a major win for Bread membership.
By Marlysa D. Gamblin and Kathleen King
The U.S. Department of Agriculture defines food insecurity as when a person or household does not have regular, reliable access to the foods needed for good health. Black, Indigenous, and Other People of Color (BIPOC) have historically had higher...
With the coronavirus now spreading in low-resource contexts and new waves of infection expected in the coming year, better nutrition for vulnerable people is more important than ever.
“As you therefore have received Christ Jesus the Lord, continue to live your lives in him, rooted and built up in him and established in faith.” These words from Colossians 2:6 remind us of the faith that is active in love for our neighbors.
The Bible on...
Dear Members of Congress,
As the president and Congress are preparing their plans for this year, almost 100 church leaders—from all the families of U.S. Christianity—are...
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is designed to respond to changes in need, making it well suited to respond to crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bread for the World and its partners are asking Congress to provide $200 million for global nutrition in the fiscal year 2020 budget.
In 2017, 11.8 percent of households in the U.S.—40 million people—were food-insecure, meaning that they were unsure at some point during the year about how they would provide for their next meal.