- About Hunger
- How to End Hunger
- Our Impact
- Get Involved
Editor’s note: In an earlier post, we mentioned that while U.S. poverty-focused development assistance remains critically important as the world works toward the new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), there is now an increasing focus on domestic resource mobilization, a less traditional form of development assistance that seeks to enable partner countries to raise more of their own resources. Here, Steven Damiano introduces his new briefing paper on the topic.
By Steven Damiano, Bread for the World Institute
Developing countries face the challenge of raising sufficient resources to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, an ambitious list of 17 goals and 169 targets that include ending hunger and extreme poverty, in an environment where wealthy countries have been unwilling to commit more money for development assistance. When the global community met at the Third Financing for Development Conference in Addis Ababa in July 2015, developed countries failed to make any significant new pledges of foreign aid.
Instead, developing countries committed to raising more of their own resources for the Sustainable Development Goals through domestic resource mobilization (DRM). Developed countries committed to supporting these efforts. As part of its commitment, the United States pledged, through the Addis Tax Initiative, to significantly increase assistance that supports countries in mobilizing their own resources.
Domestic resource mobilization encompasses all the way in which countries can mobilize their own resources for national priorities. A wide range of public and private funding mechanisms and financial flows are considered part of DRM, among them tax revenues, natural resource revenues, remittances, funds from public-private partnerships, public bonds, and philanthropic gifts.
A recently released Bread for the World Institute briefing paper, “Domestic Resource Mobilization for Development: Ideas for U.S. Policy,” looks at how assistance for DRM could be part of a wider U.S. government effort to promote inclusive institutions and fiscal transparency in fragile and low-income states—the countries with the highest barriers to achieving the SDGs.
When government build inclusive institutions, respect human rights, and institutionalize the rule of law, they are more likely to be able to provide safety nets for their most vulnerable people and achieve the level of inclusive economic growth needed to lift more of their people out of hunger and poverty. Low tax revenues, illicit financial flows out of the country, and corruption pose barriers to such institutional development.
While U.S. and other donor support for countries that are low-income, fragile, or both should help them respond to all of these challenges, the briefing paper focuses primarily on the role of taxation. Ideally, a stronger tax system can encourage institutional development and more transparent governance, creating an economic environment that both encourages local businesses to invest their profits domestically and is more likely to attract foreign direct investment. The paper argues that the U.S. government risks leaving many countries behind on the path to the SDGs if it focuses only on countries with the most suitable operating environments.
The paper makes the following key points about U.S. support for DRM:
If the U.S. government uses the Addis Tax Initiative to take a wider approach to DRM as outlined above, it can help ensure that all countries have an opportunity to achieve the SDGs. However, if U.S. policies do not recognize the need for capacity building and pursue DRM only in countries that offer the most suitable operating environment, the U.S. government will miss key opportunities to help ensure that low-income countries and/or fragile states have both the resources and the capacity they need to achieve the SDGs. DRM for development has a role to play in ending hunger and extreme poverty by 2030.
Steven Damiano was a summer 2015 Crook Fellow at Bread for the World Institute.
Photo: Bringing government services to remote areas, such as this small mountain community in the mountains of Lesotho, requires both resources and creative, flexible approaches to using them. Reverie Zurba/USAID.
By Marlysa D. Gamblin and Kathleen King
The U.S. Department of Agriculture defines food insecurity as when a person or household does not have regular, reliable access to the foods needed for good health. Black, Indigenous, and Other People of Color (BIPOC) have historically had higher...
With the coronavirus now spreading in low-resource contexts and new waves of infection expected in the coming year, better nutrition for vulnerable people is more important than ever.
“As you therefore have received Christ Jesus the Lord, continue to live your lives in him, rooted and built up in him and established in faith.” These words from Colossians 2:6 remind us of the faith that is active in love for our neighbors.
The Bible on...
Dear Members of Congress,
As the president and Congress are preparing their plans for this year, almost 100 church leaders—from all the families of U.S. Christianity—are...
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is designed to respond to changes in need, making it well suited to respond to crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bread for the World and its partners are asking Congress to provide $200 million for global nutrition in the fiscal year 2020 budget.
In 2017, 11.8 percent of households in the U.S.—40 million people—were food-insecure, meaning that they were unsure at some point during the year about how they would provide for their next meal.